home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- @ Approved Agenda -- X3T9.2 Meeting #85
- December 4-5, 1989 -- San Diego, CA
-
- 1. Opening Remarks
-
- 2. Approval of Agenda
-
- 3. Attendance and Membership
- 3.1 Roll Call of Members in Jeopardy
-
- 4. Approval of Minutes - October Meeting Raleigh, NC (X3T9.2/89-126)
-
- 5. Document Distribution
-
- 6. Liaison Reports
- 6.1 ISO [Milligan]
- 6.2 IT8
- 6.3 SCSI-2 Common Access Method Committee Report [Allan]
- 6.4 Fiber Channel [Allan and Stephens]
- 6.5 X3B7.1 Report
-
- 7. Review of Old Action Items
-
- 8. Working Group and/or Project Status Reports
- 8.1 ESDI [Allan]
- 8.1.1 Approval of ESDI Editing Changes (X3T9.2/89-139) [Allan]
- 8.2 SCSI General Working Group (X3T9.2/89-138)
- 8.3 Report on Cable Impedance Special Working Group Meeting (Tuesday a.m.)
-
- 9. Old Business
- 9.1 Cable Testing Results (Tuesday a.m.)
- 9.2 Single-cable 16-bit SCSI (X3T9.2/89-94 Rev 4)
- 9.3 SCSI Transceivers [Murdock]
- 9.4 Packetized SCSI (X3T9.2/89-130) [Stephens]
- 9.5 Diagnostic Command Set (X3T9.2/89-119, -134, -135, -136, and -137)
- 9.6 Call for Volunteers -- X3T9.2 Chairman and Vice Chairman (89-125)
-
- 10. New Business
-
- 10.1 Multi-Ported SCSI (X3T9.2/89-133) [Stephens]
- 10.2 Public Review Comment #3 on BSR X3.131-198x SCSI-2 (X3T9.2/89-140)
- 10.3 Review of new documents
- 10.4 Agenda for the San Jose Working Group
- 10.5 Public Review Comment #4 on BSR X3.131-198x SCSI-2 (X3T9.2/89-144)
- 10.6 Proposed additional ASCQs for SCSI-2 (X3T9.2/89-145) [Penokie]
- 10.7 SCSI-1 CHANGE DEFINITION Guidelines [Houlder]
- 10.8 Public Review Comment #2 on BSR X3.131-198x SCSI-2
- 10.9 Public Review Comment #5 on BSR X3.131-198x SCSI-2
- 10.10 Suggested Editorial Correction SCSI-2 (X3T9.2/89-146) [Snively]
- 11. Review of Action Items
- 12. Meeting Schedule
- 12.1 General Working Group Schedule for 1990
- 12.2 Financing Meetings
- 13. Adjournment
-
- Minutes -- X3T9.2 Meeting #85
- December 4-5, 1989 -- San Diego, CA
-
- 1. Opening Remarks
-
- John Lohmeyer, the chairman, called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m.,
- Monday December 4, 1989. He thanked Fred Meadows of NCR Corporation for
- hosting the meeting and he also thanked Classic Conferences for arranging
- the meeting.
-
- As is customary, the people attending introduced themselves. A copy of the
- X3T9.2 membership list was circulated for attendance and corrections.
- Copies of a revised draft agenda and the recent document register were made
- available to those attending. Information on X3T9.2 and Mailing
- Subscription forms was made available.
-
- 2. Approval of Agenda
-
- The draft agenda was approved with a correction to item 10.2 and several
- additions:
-
- 10.2 Public Review Comment #3 on BSR X3.131-198x SCSI-2 (X3T9.2/89-140)
- 10.5 Public Review Comment #4 on BSR X3.131-198x SCSI-2 (X3T9.2/89-144)
- 10.6 Proposed additional ASCQs for SCSI-2 (X3T9.2/89-145) [Penokie]
- 10.7 SCSI-1 CHANGE DEFINITION Guidelines [Houlder]
- 10.8 Public Review Comment #2 on BSR X3.131-198x SCSI-2
- 10.9 Public Review Comment #5 on BSR X3.131-198x SCSI-2
- 10.10 Suggested Editorial Correction SCSI-2 (X3T9.2/89-146) [Snively]
- 12.2 Financing Meetings
-
- 3. Attendance and Membership
-
- The membership requirements were reviewed. X3 rules permit one vote per
- organization. An individual from a new organization must attend one plenary
- meeting as an observer before he/she may apply for voting membership via a
- letter to the chairman of X3T9.2. The individual may vote at the second
- plenary meeting. Working group meetings do not count toward attendance
- requirements.
-
- Several organizations changed their representatives during the meeting, but
- no new organizations joined the committee. Two organizations were
- terminated for non-attendance (see 3.1 below) so X3T9.2 now has 74 voting
- organizations down from 76 at the last meeting. Enclosure (1) is the list
- of attendees at the meeting. Enclosure (2) is the X3T9.2 membership changes
- since the last minutes and enclosure (3) is the current X3T9.2 membership
- list.
-
- 3.1 Roll Call of Members in Jeopardy
-
- The chairman stated that he had sent jeopardy letters to all
- representatives of the following organizations: AT&T; Cipher/Optimem;
- Cygnet Systems; Data General Corp.; DDC Pertec; Distributed Logic Corp.;
- DPT; ITT Cannon; Methode Electronics, Inc.; Scientific Micro Systems;
- Siemens; Stewart Connector Systems; Storage Technology Corp./Aspen
- Peripherals; Sun Microsystems, Inc.; and Tandem Computer Inc.
-
- The letters said that these organizations had failed to attend two of the
- last three plenary meetings and that their membership would be terminated
- unless they attended the December plenary meeting. John Lohmeyer noted
- that the jeopardy letter to Terry Meighen (Stewart Connector Systems) was
- returned marked "Undeliverable as Addressed - Forwarding Order Expired".
-
- Members were present from all of the organizations except: AT&T; Siemens;
- and Stewart Connector Systems.
-
- John Lohmeyer moved and Robert Snively seconded that the AT&T membership
- be continued despite their failure to attend. John Lohmeyer said that
- Joe Lawlor was unable to attend the meeting because his wife is pregnant
- and Jim Semenak's trip request was denied due to a tight year-end budget.
- The motion passed 42 Yes, 1 No, and 1 Abstained.
-
- The principals and alternates from the non-attending organizations,
- except AT&T, were changed to observer status.
-
- 4. Approval of Minutes - October Meeting Raleigh, NC (X3T9.2/89-126)
-
- The minutes were approved as written.
-
- 5. Document Distribution
-
- The chairman complimented Katrina Gray of the X3 Secretariat for speedy
- handling of the mailing. She received the original on November 7 and the
- chairman received his copy on November 13, less than a week later. Katrina
- also implemented the committee request that the mailing be 3-hole punched.
-
- Members who have any problems with their mailing subscription should deal
- directly with Katrina at (202) 626-5741.
-
- John Lohmeyer requested that all documents for the January mailing be sent
- to him before January 15, 1990.
-
- The following new or revised documents were distributed and/or discussed at
- the meeting:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Document Doc Date Author Description of Document
- ------------- -------- --------------- ---------------------------------------
- X3T9.2/89-94 11/23/89 G. Penokie 16 Bit Data Path on a Single 68-pin
- Rev 5 Connector
- X3T9.2/89-130 G. Stephens Proposed Parallel Packet Structure for
- Rev 1 SCSI-3
- X3T9.2/89-133 11/30/89 G. Stephens Multi-ported SCSI
- Rev 1
- X3T9.2/89-139 12/2/89 D. Allan Summary of ESDI Editing Changes from
- Rev 1 Rev 3 to Present
- X3T9.2/89-144 11/13/89 S. Cornaby SCSI-2 Public Review Comment #4 (Re:
- 16-bit cable)
- X3T9.2/89-145 12/5/89 G. Penokie Proposed additional ASCQs for SCSI-2
- Rev 1
- X3T9.2/89-146 B. Snively Suggested Editorial Correction of Tape
- Density Parameter
- X3T9.2/89-147 12/1/89 B. Spence Reflections on Writing to EOT
- X3T9.2/89-148 12/1/89 B. Spence Single-Ended Cable Test Report
- X3T9.2/89-150 11/24/89 G. Penokie 16 Bit Data Path on a single 68-pin
- Connector (Appendix form)
- X3T9.2/89-152 12/1/89 Robertson/ SCSI-2 Public Review Comment #4 (re:
- Cornaby Caching)
- X3T9.2/89-154 12/1/89 J. Iamartino DECconnect Media Lab Evaluation of
- SCSI-2 Cables
- X3T9.2/89-155 D. Shoemaker Notes on SC-25 Meeting Milan, Italy,
- Oct 31 - Nov 1, 1989
- X3T9.2/89-156 D. Shoemaker Notes on SC-25 TAG Meeting ANSI NYC,
- Dec 1, 1989
- X3T9.2/89-157 12/4/89 D. Peterson Proposed 16 bit SCSI
- X3T9.2/89-158 10/23/89 P. Joslin SCSI-2 Public Review Comment #2 (Re:
- Scanner Cmnd Set)
-
- The current document register is enclosure (4).
-
- 6. Liaison Reports
-
- 6.1 ISO [Milligan]
-
- Gene Milligan informed the committee that he had a copies of ISO
- 9315:1989 (Flexible Disk), ISO 9314-2:1989 (FDDI-MAC) 65 and ISO
- 9316:1989 (SCSI-1) ISO standards. The prices are $34 for the flexible
- disk document, $65 for the FDDI-MAC document and $92 for the SCSI-1
- document.
-
- Del Shoemaker reported on the first ISO/IEC SC-25 meeting (See X3T9.2/89-
- 155). SC-25 has been formed from a combination of SC-13 and SC-83. Four
- working groups within SC-25 have been proposed to cover the work that was
- being done by SC-13 and SC-83. JTC-1 has to approve these proposed
- working groups at their next meeting in May, 1990.
-
- EIA is the US TAG (Technical Advisory Group) to SC-25 WG1. IEEE is the
- US TAG to SC-25 WG2. EIA is the US TAG to SC-25 WG3. X3T9 is the US TAG
- to SC-25 Working Group 4 (WG4), and CBEMA is the secretariat. There is a
- need for a convenor of SC-25 WG4. The first meeting of SC-25 WG4 is
- planned for the last week of June in Germany. The details are not
- finalized at this time.
-
- 6.2 IT8
-
- There was no report.
-
- 6.3 SCSI-2 Common Access Method Committee Report [Allan]
-
- Dal Allan reported on the November 1st CAM meeting. This was the most
- successful meeting to date. There were no presentations, just real work.
- The document is shaping up, and it is expected that a good document will
- be available in the first quarter of 1990. CAM meetings were scheduled
- for December 7 in the Catamaran Hotel and January 8 at the Red Lion in
- San Jose, CA.
-
- There were two ATA meetings since the last plenary meeting. Significant
- progress is being made. The next ATA meeting was scheduled for January
- 5, 1989, at Maxtor in San Jose, CA. Contact the SCSI BBS at 316-686-8700
- or Larry Lamers at 408-432-4341 if you need information on getting to
- Maxtor.
-
- 6.4 Fiber Channel [Allan and Stephens]
-
- Dal Allan reported. The committee has focused on FC2, the framing layer,
- and the mechanism for control of flow across the fiber. A working
- document has been prepared by Joe Mathis of IBM. The FC3 documents on
- interfaces to SCSI and IPI have not been started. A document on how to
- use the IPI-3 command set on HPPI could used as a model for these
- documents.
-
- A presentation of short-wave lasers (Compact Disc type) for data
- transmission was made by Ron Soderstrom of IBM. This has a potential of
- significantly lowering the costs of a connection. It may be possible to
- use plastic fiber, allowing use of cheap connectors. However, at this
- time, many of the components needed to use short-wave lasers are not in
- production.
-
- A switching topology debate is ongoing. The debate is being hampered by
- syntax and terminology issues.
-
- Later in the meeting, Gary Stephens presented an overview of Fiber
- Channel which was prepared by Joe Mathis of IBM.
-
- 6.5 X3B7.1 Report
-
- Doug Pickford reported. The X3B7 committee is working on a definition of
- test signals and test methods which will be issued through EDEMA.
-
- Doug attended the X3B7.1 meeting November 6-7 in Phoenix. There was
- discussion at the X3B7.1 meeting on a model for the Diagnostic Command
- Set (DCS), which resulted in another document. That document was edited
- by Ricardo Dominguez of Texas Instruments.
-
- The next meeting with the X3B7.1 participants is scheduled for Wednesday
- afternoon January 10, 1989 at the Red Lion in San Jose.
-
- 7. Review of Old Action Items
-
- 1. Bob Bellino will provide a report on cable impedance. Complete: 89-
- 142.
-
- 2. John Lohmeyer will submit the response to the public review comment #1
- to X3T9 for approval. Complete.
-
- 3. John Lohmeyer will request that the X3 Secretariat to 3-hole punch the
- committee mailings. Complete.
-
- 4. Larry Lamers will select an appropriate ASC/ASCQ for I/O PROCESS
- TERMINATED. Complete.
-
- 5. Larry Lamers will correct the error in the TB bit description.
- Complete.
-
- 8. Working Group and/or Project Status Reports
-
- 8.1 ESDI [Allan]
-
- 8.1.1 Approval of ESDI Editing Changes (X3T9.2/89-139 Rev 1) [Allan]
-
- Dal Allan presented a document which included the editorial
- modifications made to the ESDI document since January plus several
- proposed modification found since ESDI was approved.
-
- Larry Lamers moved and Dal Allan seconded that the ESDI technical
- editor be directed to make the editorial changes in X3T9.2/89-139 Rev
- 1 to the ESDI standard during the publication of the standard. The
- motion passed, 33 yes, 0 no, and 5 abstained.
-
- 8.2 SCSI General Working Group (X3T9.2/89-138)
-
- Ken Post of Future Domain hosted the October 30-31 SCSI general working
- group meeting in Santa Ana, CA at the Embassy Suites hotel. 34 people
- were present.
-
- Gary Stephens brought copies of two proposals, one on a parallel packet
- SCSI protocol and another on multiple port SCSI. Gary agreed to reformat
- these proposals for the San Diego plenary meeting and to make
- presentations on them (see 9.4 and 10.1).
-
- George Penokie's latest P-cable proposal was reviewed. The group decided
- to add a Q cable, which would be used to expand the bus to 32 bits via a
- second cable, much like the A/B cabling scheme. The group also decided
- to prohibit mixed systems using both A/B and P cables (see 9.2).
-
- Gary Murdock gave a presentation on two proposals, one for short distance
- differential SCSI transceivers and one for long distance, small swing
- differential SCSI transceivers (see 9.3).
-
- Tuesday morning was spent reviewing the issues of testing embedded SCSI
- devices. George Canevit, co-chairman of X3B7.1, Ricardo Dominguez and
- Reuben Yomtov, members of X3B7.1, were present for this portion of the
- meeting. The discussion helped to clarify the positions of the three
- factions (drive vendors, drive tester vendors, and systems integrators).
- (See 9.5).
-
- Another joint meeting was tentatively arranged for the afternoon of the
- January 10 SCSI working group meeting in San Jose.
-
- 8.3 Report on Cable Impedance Special Working Group Meeting
-
- Bob Bellino reported. The first meeting occurred during the previous
- plenary meeting at Raleigh, NC. Agreements were reached at that meeting
- on cable and conductor diameters and the testing method. The question of
- whether the 90 ohms minimum requirement is realistic for single-ended
- cables was the main topic of discussion.
-
- Bob presented an evaluation summary of work done at the DEC Connect Lab
- was presented along with a letter requesting that these parameters be
- adopted by the X3T9.2 committee. See X3T9.2/89-153 for the details of
- the meeting.
-
- The consensus of the group was not to reduce the 90 ohm impedance
- requirement for single-ended cables at this time, even though there is
- substantial evidence that cables with lower impedance work well in a
- systems environment. There is also evidence that other cables that meet
- the 90 ohm impedance requirement have failed in the systems environment.
- It is clear that further work is needed to define the actual parameters
- necessary to operate correctly.
-
- The next meeting will be January 8, 1990, at 9:00 am at Red Lion in San
- Jose. Larry Lamers will replace Bob Bellino as chair of this group.
-
- 9. Old Business
-
- 9.1 Cable Testing Results
-
- Bill Spence presented the results of a preliminary evaluation that Texas
- Instruments has done on a new pleated-foil cable 3M has developed for
- single-ended systems. The results are favorable and further testing is
- planned.
-
- 9.2 Single-cable 16-bit SCSI (X3T9.2/89-94R5, 89-150R0)
-
- George Penokie presented an overview of the changes made from revision 4
- to revision 5. The presentation also included a proposed active SCSI
- converter to connect A/B and P/Q systems. Several problems were raised
- with the active SCSI converter. The concept was dropped. George will
- modify the document to reflect this.
-
- George also presented a version of his proposal suitable for inclusion in
- an appendix (89-150).
-
-
-
-
- 9.3 SCSI Transceivers [Murdock]
-
- Gary Murdock gave a presentation on two proposals, one for short distance
- differential SCSI transceivers and one for long distance, small swing
- differential SCSI transceivers. See document X3T9.2/89-131 and 89-132.
-
- The level of interest is this subject has escalated to the point that
- this will no longer be a special working group. The SCSI transceiver
- issues will be discussed within the regular working group meeting at the
- Red Lion, January 9-10.
-
- Gary would like to focus that discussion on a review RS-485 specification
- aimed at reducing some requirements to allow a higher level of device
- integration.
-
- 9.4 Packetized SCSI (X3T9.2/89-130) [Stephens]
-
- Gary Stephens gave a presentation on packetized SCSI. This topic is
- related to the use of Fiber Channel as physical medium for SCSI. Gary
- has done a great deal of work developing the concepts needed for the next
- generation of advanced SCSI. Multi-ported SCSI (see 10.1) is also tied
- in with this work.
-
- 9.5 Diagnostic Command Set (X3T9.2/89-119, -134, -135, -136, and -137)
-
- A ad-hoc meeting occurred on Monday morning to begin development of a
- model definition of concepts and fundamentals. A list of desired
- features for diagnostic mode was generated. A list of statements of the
- consequences of being in diagnostic mode was generated. This work will
- continue at the next working group meeting (see 6.5)
-
- 9.6 Call for Volunteers -- X3T9.2 Chairman and Vice Chairman (89-125)
-
- John Lohmeyer said that so far he is aware of three people who have
- applied for these positions. He encouraged any other applicants to get
- their two letters into the X3 Secretariat before January 5, 1990.
-
- 10. New Business
-
- 10.1 Multi-Ported SCSI (X3T9.2/89-133) [Stephens]
-
- Gary Stephens gave a presentation on his proposal for multi-porting in
- SCSI-3. See 89-133 for details.
-
- 10.2 Public Review Comment #3 on BSR X3.131-198x SCSI-2 (X3T9.2/89-140)
-
- This document is a comment from Jeff Stai of Western Digital on the need
- for a single connector 16-bit solution in SCSI-2. There was extensive
- discussion on this public review comment and on a similar public review
- comment from Micropolis (see 10.5).
-
- Don Peterson of Ciprico read a corporate position letter opposing the
- proposed addition (see X3T9.2/89-157).
-
-
- Gene Milligan moved and Bill Spence seconded that a note be added to the
- cable section of the SCSI-2 dpANS that X3T9.2 is documenting an alternate
- 16-bit single-cable solution and an alternate 32-bit solution and expects
- to be able to remove the B cable definition in a subsequent version of
- SCSI. The motion passed: 39 yes, 4 no, and 1 abstention.
-
- [Chairman's note: What follows are several motions and amendments that
- occurred during the discussion. While reading this section, it may be
- helpful to note that any substantive change to the document will require
- another public review period prior to the X3 letter ballot for approval
- of SCSI-2. This would delay approval by at least 3 months and quite
- possibly much longer. It was initially thought that adding an appendix
- is not "substantive", however the X3 rules do not define the term. Later
- Del Shoemaker, X3T9 chairman and SMC chairman, stated that he thought X3
- would rule such an addition as being substantive.]
-
- Peter Johansson moved and Jeff Stai seconded that X3T9.2 document the
- physical characteristics of the 16-bit single cable solution and an
- alternative 32-bit solution in the body of the SCSI-2 document.
-
- Gene Milligan moved and George Penokie seconded that consideration of the
- motion be deferred until the discussion of documents 89-94R5 and 89-150
- is completed. This motion passed: 36 yes, 8 no, and 3 abstentions.
-
- After the proposals were discussed (9.2), the Johansson motion was
- reconsidered. The motion failed: 15 yes and 35 opposed.
-
- Peter Johansson moved and Jeff Stai seconded that X3T9.2 document the
- physical characteristics of the 16-bit single cable solution and an
- alternative 32-bit solution in the appendix of the SCSI-2 document.
- [Chairman's note: By "physical characteristics", it was meant that the
- new commands and 16-bit arbitration not be included.]
-
- John Lohmeyer spoke against documenting yet another two-cable proposal
- for 32-bit SCSI. The P/Q cable approach may not be anymore acceptable
- than the A/B cable approach. He advocated doing nothing more than adding
- the Milligan note until such time as the new solutions have evolved
- further.
-
- Bill Spence moved and Steve Cornaby seconded that the motion be amended
- to state that X3T9.2/89-094R4 be incorporated as an appendix to the SCSI-
- 2 document. [Chairman's note: The Revision 4 document does not include
- the Q cable.] The motion passed: 29 yes, 12 no, and 7 abstentions.
-
- The revised motion was that X3T9.2 incorporate the physical
- characteristics from X3T9.2/89-094R4 into an appendix of the SCSI-2
- document.
-
- Ken Post moved and George Penokie seconded that the motion be amended to
- include full documentation on the 16-bit and 32-bit solutions. The
- motion passed: 24 yes, 15 opposed, and 10 abstentions.
-
- The revised motion was that X3T9.2 fully document a single-cable 16-bit
- and 32-bit solution and incorporate them into an appendix of the SCSI-2
- document. The vote was taken (35 yes, 8 no, and 2 abstentions), but the
- chair declined to rule whether the motion had passed or failed until he
- conferred with Del Shoemaker over voting requirements (50% vs. 2/3rds).
- Due to the late hour, the meeting was recessed until Tuesday at 8:30 am.
-
- [Chairman's note: Tuesday morning Del Shoemaker stated that a change
- which adds significant new information that was not in the document
- during the first public review, will cause a second public review period
- even if the new information is only in an appendix. Due to this
- fundamental change in the assumptions the group had been using about what
- is "substantive", the motion was revised as follows:]
-
- That X3T9.2 will fully document a single-cable 16-bit and 32-bit solution
- in such a manner that it could be incorporated into an appendix of the
- SCSI-2 document. The motion passed: 41 yes, 5 no, and 3 abstentions.
-
- This activity was placed on the agenda for the January working group
- meeting. Action on the public review comments was deferred until the
- February plenary meeting.
-
- 10.3 Review of new documents
-
- All the new documents were covered under their associated agenda items
- except for X3T9.2/89-147 (Reflections on Writing to EOT). This item was
- added to the agenda for the January working group meeting.
-
- 10.4 Agenda for the San Jose Working Group
-
- 1. Develop alternative 16-bit and 32-bit solutions.
- 2. Draft responses on the public review comments on the 16-bit single
- connector.
- 3. Draft a resolve on the public review comment requesting a segment number
- field in the cache page.
- 4. Draft a response to the public review comment requesting changes to the
- scanner command set.
- 4. Differential Transceiver discussion. [Murdock]
- 5. Review documents 89-133 and 89-130. [Stephens]]
- 6. Reflections on Writing to EOT (X3T9.2/89-147) [Spence]
- 7. SCSI-1 CHANGE DEFINITION Guidelines [Houlder]
- 8. Queuing restrictions "per initiator"? [Houlder]
-
- 10.5 Public Review Comment #4 on BSR X3.131-198x SCSI-2 (X3T9.2/89-144)
-
- This public review comment was submitted by Steve Cornaby of Micropolis
- requesting that an appendix documenting the single-connector 16-bit cable
- be included in SCSI-2. Please refer to item 10.2 for the discussion of
- this comment. Action was deferred to the February plenary meeting.
-
- 10.6 Proposed additional ASCQs for SCSI-2 (X3T9.2/89-145) [Penokie]
-
- George Penokie presented a request for additional sense code qualifiers
- to assist the initiator in recovering from read errors. During the
- discussion the proposal was modified and revision 1 was accepted. The
- technical editor was directed to incorporate 89-145R1 into the SCSI-2
- document as an non-substantive addition.
-
- 10.7 SCSI-1 CHANGE DEFINITION Guidelines [Houlder]
-
- Gerry Houlder asked that guidelines be developed to constrain SCSI-2
- device operation when a CHANGE DEFINITION command is used to switch their
- operating mode to SCSI-1 mode. Gerry Houlder requested volunteers to
- work with him in developing these guidelines.
-
- 10.8 Public Review Comment #2 on BSR X3.131-198x SCSI-2
-
- John Lohmeyer said that he had been informed of a 65-page comment from
- Philip Joslin of Photo Matrix Corp. on Friday December 1. The actual
- comment is only a couple pages, but a preliminary product specification
- was also included. The comment concerns the scanner command set.
-
- John had called Mark Pearson (Scanner Section Editor) who was planning to
- contact Philip directly. An agenda item was added to the January working
- group meeting to resolve this issue. John asked that interested parties
- contact the chair or Mark Pearson.
-
-
- 10.9 Public Review Comment #5 on BSR X3.131-198x SCSI-2
-
- This public review comment was from Steve Cornaby of Micropolis on the
- need for a segment field in the cache control page of SCSI-2. Action on
- this comment was deferred to the February plenary meeting and the comment
- was remanded to the San Jose working group for a proposed solution.
-
- 10.10 Suggested Editorial Correction SCSI-2 (X3T9.2/89-146) [Snively]
-
- Bob Snively proposed an editorial change to clarify the default density
- code for sequential-access devices. The technical editor was directed to
- incorporate this change in the SCSI-2 document as a non-substantive
- clarification.
-
- 11. Review of Action Items
-
- 1. Dal Allan will incorporate editorial changes into the ESDI document.
-
- 2. Larry Lamers will incorporate 89-145 and 89-146 into the SCSI-2
- document.
-
- 3. Larry Lamers will add a note concerning alternative 16-bit and 32-bit
- solutions and the possible future deletion of the B cable into the
- SCSI-2 document.
-
- 3. George Penokie will revise the 89-094 and 89-150 documents.
-
- 4. Mark Pearson will investigate the public review comment on scanner
- devices.
-
- 5. Larry Lamers will chair the Cable Impedance Special Working Group
- Meeting January 8, 1990.
-
-
-
- 12. Meeting Schedule
-
- The next meeting of X3T9.2 will be February 19-20, 1990 at the Wyndham
- Southpark Hotel (512) 448-2222 in Austin, Texas hosted by Motorola. Please
- mention the X3T9 meetings when making reservations to receive the group room
- rate of $79.00 single or double, plus tax. The cut-off date for
- reservations is January 22, 1990.
-
- The plenary meeting schedule is:
-
- Date Location Host
- -------------------- ------------------------ ---------------------
- February 19-20, 1990 Austin, TX Motorola
- April 23-24, 1990 St. Petersburg Beach, FL AMP
- June 18-19, 1990 Wichita, KS NCR
- August 20-21, 1990 Seattle, WA Boeing
- October 15-16, 1990 Valley Forge, PA UNISYS
- December 3-4, 1990 Southern CA ??
- February 18-19, 1991 Dallas, TX EDS
- April 22-23, 1991 St. Petersburg, FL AMP
- June 17-18, 1991 Minneapolis, MN Stanatek
- August 19-20, 1991 Vancouver, BC tbd or
- Irvine, CA Western Digital
- October 14-15, 1991 Atlanta, GA AT&T
- December 9-10, 1991 Phoenix, AZ DEC
-
-
- 12.1 General Working Group Schedule for 1990
-
- The 1990 Working Group Schedule is as follows:
-
- Date Location Host Comments
- ------------------- -------------- --------------- ----------------
- Jan 8-12, 1990 San Jose, CA Sun
- Mar 5-9, 1990 Costa Mesa, CA Western Digital
- May 7-11, 1990 Providence, RI Astro Cable {tentative}
- Jul 9-13, 1990 Rochester, MN IBM {tentative}
- Sep 4-7, 1990 Denver, CO Storagetek {tentative}
- {no CAM meeting}
- Oct 29-Nov 2, 1990 Austin, TX TI {tentative}
-
- These week-long meetings are to be divided as follows:
-
- Monday SCSI CAM Committee (except September 1990)
- Tuesday-Wednesday SCSI Working Group
- Thursday-Friday Fiber Channel
-
- 12.2 Financing Meetings
-
- John Lohmeyer informed the committee about the discussions occurring in
- X3T9 concerning how meeting costs are financed. There is a proposal to
- charge meeting fees (like IEEE 802). In theory, the room rates would be
- reduced and the expense of covering meetings would be born by all
- attendees instead of just those staying in the hotel. There is a task
- force set up at X3T9 to study this issue.
-
- Concern was expressed that the two-fee structure could result in even
- higher costs. Several years ago, it was promised that using professional
- meeting planners would not increase hotel guest room prices; in fact, it
- has. Several members expressed concern that priorities in hotel
- selection are not clear and seem to differ between the subgroups.
-
- 13. Adjournment
-
- The meeting was adjourned at 4:45 p.m. on Tuesday December 5, 1989.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- @